Texts in English

The text explores the profound connection between our deepest secrets and the silent, commanding gaze of a solitary wolf. Just as a wolf observes from a distance with unsettling calm and dominance, our hidden secrets quietly watch over our weaknesses. To confront these fears, we must undergo a powerful inner revolution—drawing back the curtains of our minds to dismantle prejudices and embrace true self-recognition. Ultimately, surrendering these secrets is a liberating act, freeing us from the comfort of ordinary conformity and guiding us toward a deeper sense of enlightenment and connection.

This text challenges the notion of a universal “meaning of life,” arguing that purpose is often a luxury dictated by social and economic conditions. It critiques the use of spiritual promises to keep the impoverished in a state of suffering while a few enjoy absolute power. Ultimately, it posits that life’s true meaning is found in the pursuit of one’s own dreams and, more importantly, in the collective struggle for those who lack the opportunity to do so.

This chronicle uses the rural metaphor of “threshing” to explore the human condition, from the intimacy of family bonds to the complexity of media manipulation. The author suggests that just as corn is stripped of its husk to reveal the grain, we must “thresh” our memories, secrets, and the information we consume. It is a call for discernment: separating the chaff of lies from the wheat of truth to uncover the “golden-yellow” of reality and the essence of our journey.

This profound essay explores the tension between essence and appearance, challenging the “theatre of vanities” that defines modern social interaction. Through sharp observations on hypocrisy—such as the contradiction between faith and fear, or moral posturing and ethical shortcuts—the text suggests that “being” has become an act of courage. It concludes that in a world of mirrors, those who refuse to perform are the ones who truly navigate reality, even if it means standing alone outside of the “bubble of iniquities.”

The essay challenges the simplistic binary of good and evil, arguing that human interests often dictate how we justify our positions. It explores the dangerous transition from “bad” to “the worst,” particularly when cruel reasoning takes hold and coherence is lost. By analyzing how people defend conflicting views—from social castes to the dark corners of the Deep Web—the author suggests that refining our judgment is the only way to confront the “elephant in the room”: the abyss of moral decay.

“The River and the Writing” is a lyrical exploration of the parallels between the movement of water and the act of composition. The author reflects on how words, like a river, navigate uncertain paths toward the unknown. It highlights the concept of “puddles” of memory—scattered thoughts that require a single drop of insight to reconnect and form a new narrative. Comparing the writer to a solitary force, the text suggests that neither the river nor the writing can be fully steered or contained, as both must remain free to find their own course, moving from the prison of silence into the beauty of verse and prose.

The text reflects on how the ease of the digital era, specifically the rise of AI, may be eroding the traditional pursuit of knowledge. Nilson Lattari contrasts the “intermediate generation” with today’s real-time dependency, criticizing the superficiality of social media “experts.” He argues that true knowledge is not just about data, but about the ethical and empathetic journey of self-discovery. By refusing to be challenged, individuals close the door to growth, whereas embracing our limits and seeking reliable thinkers allows for a constant renewal of the mind and the world.

The chronicle explores doubt not as a sign of insecurity, but as a vital instrument of human growth and a shield against manipulation. By comparing the adult’s reflection to a child’s innate curiosity, the author argues that saying “I don’t know” is a supreme act of humanity. The text illustrates how scientists, leaders, and individuals renew themselves when they challenge established dogmas, suggesting that the “Why?” is the gateway to moving from mere uncertainty to a profound sense of wonderment.

The essay provides a grim analysis of indifference as a deliberate and harmful detachment from the struggles of others. The author argues that indifferent people are often cowardly, using beautiful words and religious or political masks to disguise their self-interest and lack of empathy. By ignoring social tragedies and the plight of the needy, they cultivate a habit that destroys the fabric of society. Ultimately, the text concludes that true freedom cannot exist in isolation or amid suffering; it is only achieved when we actively care for one another.

The text explores the transition of the digital prompt “What are you thinking?” from Facebook to the physical world (a wall). The author reflects on the risks of total transparency, suggesting that if our thoughts were visible like “bubbles,” we would desperately try to hide them. It critiques the lack of self-censorship on social media and questions the sincerity of those who overshare, ultimately highlighting the value of mental privacy and trusted connections.

The text reflects on how time accelerates as we trade our early sense of adventure for hollow, predictable routines. It questions whether consumerism and duties are the only forces driving us, proposing instead that we can “re-color” our days. By embracing small surprises—like a different path home or a conversation with a stranger—we transform our lives from a series of bureaucratic steps into a vibrant film. Ultimately, it suggests that willpower and the “small madness” of following our desires are what truly turn a passing day into a lasting memory.

The text delves into the unique psyche of poets, who look beyond common sense to shape reality through a “magical lens.” It describes the poet as a translator of colors, feelings, and images that exist in a rare, pure imagination. Instead of judging the world, poets simply experience it with their eyes of reality closed and eyes of imagination open. They are portrayed as generous but lonely figures, struggling to communicate truths that ordinary language cannot fully grasp, ultimately giving meaning to beauty that would otherwise remain misunderstood.